Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. City of Long Beach

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 27, 2009No. Case CV 04-9692 AHM (Ex)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF TRANSCRIPTS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FROM THE 1989-1990 LOS ANGE-LES COUNTY GRAND JURY” AS MODIFIED BY PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

May this Court order the Los Angeles Superior Court to produce the transcripts of testimony given before and the exhibits presented to a Los Angeles County Grand Jury in 1989 and 1990, despite the Superi- or Court having ordered that such material “is not to be viewed, inspected or copied except by order of the Presiding Judge, Assistant Presiding Judge or…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. RoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Bolus v. Carnicella, EsquireDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Heeter v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Kyle Zoellner v. Eric LoseyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API