Legal Opinion

Kyle Zoellner v. Eric Losey

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 14, 2021No. 3:18-cv-04471Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, Case No. 18-cv-04471-EMC (DMR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 111 10 CITY OF ARCATA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Kyle Zoellner alleges civil rights claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Defendants 13 City of Arcata (“City”), several City officials, and several City police officers. [Docket No. 106, 14 Fifth Amended Complaint (“5AC”).] On January 8, 2021, Plaintiff issued a subpoena to the District 15 Attorney for the County of Humboldt (“DA”). The DA did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
United States v. John A. WalczakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
Socialist Workers Party, Cross-Appellants v. Joseph Grubisic, and Bernard Carey, Deponent-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.