Legal Opinion

Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. Cusick

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 6, 1956No. C 51-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, Chief Judge.

On December 28, 1954 the Patent Office issued U. S. Patent No. 2,698,009 to the individual defendant, Will E. Cusick. This patent covers a fluted fabric and a method of making the same. The chief use of this fabric is as a trim for ladies’ undergarments, particularly slips. Will E. Cusick has assigned the patent to defendant Beautiflute, Inc. and the fabric is being manufactured by defendant Will E. Cusick Company under a license from Beautiflute. The issuance of the patent to Cusick was announced to the garment industry on December 29, 1954 by a full-page advertisement…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Brooks Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  2. W. E. Plechaty Co. v. Heckett Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1956
  3. Curto's, Inc. v. Krich-New Jersey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
  4. Gold Fuel Service, Inc. v. Esso Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
  5. Delaware Tool Steel Corp. v. Brunner & Lay, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API