Legal Opinion
Delaware Tool Steel Corp. v. Brunner & Lay, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 6, 1956No. Civ. A. Nos. 1799-1802Published
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This matter arises from plaintiff’s objections to certain of defendants’ interrogatories. Plaintiff brings suit under § 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act; §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act; and § 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended. 15 U.S.C.A. §§■ 13a, 15, 26, 13(a).
Plaintiff and defendants are competitors in the business of manufacturing and selling paving breaker accessory tools. Plaintiff alleges during the period from about June 30, 1955, defendants have sold, contracted to sell, and offered to sell to certain of its purchasers paving breaker accessory tools at special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. CusickDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956