State v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges against him. We disagree.
In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court must determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the offense charged and that defendant was the perpetrator of the offense. State v. Odom, 99 N.C. App. 265, 393 S.E.2d 146, disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 640, 399 S.E.2d 332 (1990). All evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, and the State is entitled…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. LitchfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015