Legal Opinion

State v. Primes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1985No. 694A84PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant by this appeal presents three issues for determination: (1) Whether certain evidence was seized from defendant, a prisoner, during a period in which he was unlawfully detained, in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Federal Constitution 1 or in violation of certain North Carolina statutes; (2) whether the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial, and (3) whether the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss. We answer these questions in the negative and find no error in defendant’s trial.

I

The evidence offered by the state tended to show…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API