Legal Opinion
Graber v. Comstock Bank
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1995No. 26142PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
In three separate agreements, appellant Raymond B. Graber, II (“Graber”), then a shareholder of Outdoor Poster, Inc. (“Outdoor Poster”), acted as a guarantor of loan agreements between Comstock Bank (“Comstock”) and Outdoor Poster. On July 1, 1983, Comstock issued Outdoor Poster a $425,000.00 construction loan and received a priority interest in Outdoor Poster’s assets and a personal guarantee from Graber and his wife. The personal guarantee required Comstock to protect the value of the security interest it held in Outdoor Poster’s assets and, in the event of default, exhaust that…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Wichinsky v. MosaNevada Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Belk v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Geissler v. SanemMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Clark County Education Ass'n v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Casey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.