Legal Opinion

Geissler v. Sanem

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1997No. 97-098PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The plaintiffs, Allen and Kenneth “Val” Geissler, filed an appeal from arbitration in the District Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District in Gallatin County. The defendants, Francis “Lynn” Sanem and Linsco/Private Ledger Corp., both filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis that it failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. After the parties briefed the issue, the District Court granted the motions to dismiss. Geisslers appeal. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it concluded that Geisslers…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Paulson v. Flathead Conservation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Terra West Townhomes, L.L.C. v. Stu Henkel RealtyMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. v. Monroe Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Nelson v. Livingston Rebuild Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API