Legal Opinion

Davis v. Nanty Glo Auto Co., (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1936No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The controversy out of which this appeal arises had its origin in a distribution by the sheriff of Cambria County of a fund of $360 which came into his hands as the proceeds of the sale of the personal property of Nanty Glo Auto Company, a corporation conducting a general garage business.

Notices by three wage claimants were duly given under the provisions of the Act of April 9, 1872, P. L. 47, as amended and extended by the Acts of June 13, 1883, P. L. 116, June 3, 1887, P. L. 337, and May 12, 1891, P. L. 54, 43 PS §221, enacting, in substance, that “all moneys that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. In re Crown Point Brush Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
  3. In re Eagle Ice & Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Mulholland v. Wood, Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Nirenstein v. Colang, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Marjorie Michael, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1939
  2. Gilbert EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lehigh County · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API