Legal Opinion
Nirenstein v. Colang, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 1933No. Appeal 408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation case. A statement of facts was agreed upon between the' employer, employe and insurance carrier, and given to the referee, of which the following are pertinent on this appeal:
“1. The defendant employer, Camp Colang, Inc., is a New York Corporation engaged- in business in the State of Pennsylvania, operating a camp for girls during the months of July and August at Westcolang Park, Pike County, Pennsylvania. This camp employs camp directors, counsellors, cooks, etc.
“2. Camp Colang, Inc., has no business other than the maintenance and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Eagleson v. Harry G. Preston Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Gray v. Gray Printing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herman v. Kandrat Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- B & T Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Thomas v. BacheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Coccaro v. Herman Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Babis v. Mount Jacob Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.