W. H. Letchford & Co. v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of Louisiana
XS. STEAL irom the Second District Court oí New Orleans, Morgan, J. The plaintiffs, a commercial firm in New Orleans, brought suit by attachment against H. Jacobs, a resident of Mississippi, on a promissory note of @1,078 98. A quantity of merchandise was attached in the hands of Thomas McKenna, a warehouseman.
Read the full summary
XS. STEAL irom the Second District Court oí New Orleans, Morgan, J. The plaintiffs, a commercial firm in New Orleans, brought suit by attachment against H. Jacobs, a resident of Mississippi, on a promissory note of @1,078 98. A quantity of merchandise was attached in the hands of Thomas McKenna, a warehouseman. George E. Harrison intervened, claiming the goods attached, in consequence of a deed of trust executed in his favor, in New Orleans, on the 17th August, 1860, by the defendant Jacobs, to secure certain commercial firms in New York, for certain amounts due them by the said Jacobs, and…
1Opinion of the CourtHowELn, J.
Plaintiffs, residents of New Orleans, brought suit against defendant, residing in Brookhaven, Mississippi, and attached property in the hands of a garnishee, who answered that he had in his warehouse several packages of merchandise belonging to 'defendant, which was taken into the possession of the sheriff.
Subsequently, one George P. Harrison intervened, claiming said goods ]by virtue of a deed of trust, executed in this city, and alleged to be duly *81Recorded in Mississippi, by which defendant sold to intervenor, in trust, to secure debts due certain named creditors in New York and New…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dennis v. KolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Berghauser v. Golden State OrchardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Carter v. GaretsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922