Legal Opinion

Jobe v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 17, 2018No. AC39760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

General Statutes § 52-466(a)(1) provides in relevant part that "[a]n application for a writ of habeas corpus, other than an application pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, shall be made to the superior court, or to a judge thereof, for the judicial district in which the person whose custody is in question is claimed to be illegally confined or deprived of such person's liberty. " 1 (Emphasis added.) Our Supreme Court has concluded "that the custody requirement of § 52-466 is jurisdictional because the history and purpose of the writ of habeas corpus establish that the habeas court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Richardson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. MyersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jobe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Fairfield Shores, LLC v. DeSalvoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API