Legal Opinion
State v. Myers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 14, 2017No. AC39621PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
It has been long settled in our appellate procedure that an appellant must raise and analyze in his first and principal brief any matters necessary for the determination of his appeal, and cannot do so for the first time in his reply brief. The defendant, Ricardo O. Myers, was convicted, after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a 1 and two counts of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (5). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in excluding the video interview of a witness who was unavailable to testify.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Eskin v. CastigliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Houghtaling v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Jobe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- State v. ShinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. GriffinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.