Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 26, 2010No. SC 18541PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVELEIGH, J.

The petitioner, Kenneth Richardson, following a grant of certification to appeal by the habeas court, appeals 1 from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims on appeal that the habeas court improperly: (1) dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the petitioner was not in “custody” within the meaning of General Statutes § 52-466 2 when he filed his habeas petition; and (2) failed to construe his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as a writ of error…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. v. KuehlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Housatonic Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. O'Reilly v. VallettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. State of Iowa v. Victor Hernandez-GalarzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Fernandez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API