Legal Opinion
Daines v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 23, 2002No. 20322-1-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 P.3d 909 (2002)
111 Wash.App. 342
Bernard DAINES, and Packet Place, LLC, Appellants,
v.
SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondent.
No. 20322-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
April 23, 2002.
Cary P. Driskell, Spokane, for Appellants.
Robert B. Binger, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Spokane, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
The Public Disclosure Act requires governmental agencies to disclose public records upon request. To trigger the remedial provisions of the act, the suit must be one that could be reasonably regarded as necessary to obtain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- James Miller v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Zink v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.