Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1991No. 13-91-158-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., attempt to bring an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings pending arbitration. Because we do not believe that we have jurisdiction to hear the appeal, we dismiss.

Appellees, J.B. and Hazel Hughes, originally sued appellants for negligence and DTPA violations in connection with a financial account that appellees maintained with Merrill Lynch. Appellants, however, by a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jerald A. Turboff v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Gulf Interstate Engineering Co. v. Pecos Pipeline & Producing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Steve Childers v. Advanced Foundation Repairs, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API