Legal Opinion
Flores v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 21, 2002No. Civil Action M-02-095PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION EXCLUDING PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY
CRANE, District Judge.
Defendant Allstate Texas Lloyd’s Company moves to exclude testimony on the health effects of household mold upon Plaintiffs by their medical expert, Dr. Alberto Gutierrez. 1 Defendant contends the testimony of this expert is not sufficiently reliable under applicable law to be admitted into evidence. 2 After Defendant asserted proper challenges to the proposed testimony of Dr. Gutierrez, the Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to demonstrate the reliability and relevance of Dr. Gutierrez’s opinions as set forth in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Raymond Rosen v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Roche v. Lincoln Property Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Young v. BurtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- 27-35 Jackson Ave LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
- 27-35 Jackson Ave LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.