Legal Opinion

Stephens Cattle Co. v. Hollingsworth

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 26, 1990No. 65,077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, J.:

Stephens Cattle Co., Inc., and Hoxie Feeders, Inc., plaintiffs, appeal from the district court’s dismissal, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, of a lawsuit they instituted against Dan Hollingsworth, defendant. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion and affirm. The material facts are as follows:

Plaintiffs are Kansas corporations with their principal places of business in Sheridan County, Kansas. Defendant is a California resident and a partner in Hollingsworth Livestock, a California general partnership. In July of 1988, Donald R. Stephens, as agent for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gonzales, Administrator v. Atchison, T. & SF Rly. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Hayes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  4. Farha v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. HerrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Environmental Ventures, Inc. v. Alda Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API