Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Herren
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Reno county dismissing plaintiff’s action under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
The doctrine of forum non conveniens was recognized by this court in State of Oklahoma, ex rel., v. H. D. Lee Co., 174 Kan. 114, 118, 254 P. 2d 291. The use of the doctrine was approved by this court in Gonzales, Administrator v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Rly. Co., 189 Kan. 689, 371 P. 2d 193.
In a general way it may be said the application of the doctrine is discretionary with a court when the plaintiff has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gonzales, Administrator v. Atchison, T. & SF Rly. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- McManaman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. KronewitterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- A. T. & S. F. Hospital Ass'n v. State Commission of Revenne & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Wirt v. EsreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Lakeview Village, Inc. v. BOARD OF JOHNSON CTY. COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- MacLeod v. MacLeodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.