Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1948No. 2719, 2720, 2771-2773, 2777, 2791, 2802PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
These cases are before the Court on defendant’s motions for an order transferring the venue for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, in accordance with Section 1404 (a) of the United States Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A., approved June 25, 1948, effective September 1, 1948. In view of the importance of the question involved, the motions were heard by two judges.
These cases all arise under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 51 et seq., and because of the' common question involved the motions were consolidated for hearing.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.