Legal Opinion

Kent v. Lindstedt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 20, 1995No. 9407-05244; CA A89615PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff moves to reinstate her appeal following our order dismissing the appeal on the ground that it had been taken from a nonappealable event. We construe her motion as a request for reconsideration under ORAP 6.25, allow it and adhere to our original decision dismissing the appeal.

The trial court entered judgment on December 29, 1994. Plaintiff timely filed a motion for a new trial under ORCP 64. For reasons that are not apparent from the record, on January 30, 1995, plaintiff then filed a notice of appeal. Defendants moved to dismiss that appeal, on the ground that it was premature, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ensley v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Werline v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Grant County Federal Credit Union v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Bremner v. CharlesOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Crainic v. Multnomah County Adult Care Home ProgramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. EtchisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API