In re the Marriage of Smith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentHaselton, J.
This appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Stahl v. Krasowski, 281 Or 33, 573 P2d 309 (1978); Kent v. Lindstedt, 138 Or App 316, 908 P2d 833 (1995).
A notice of appeal, viewed in its entirety, must include some “intelligible reference * * * to the judgment being appealed.” Grant County Federal Credit Union v. Hatch, 98 Or App 1, 6 n 4, 777 P2d 1388, rev den 308 Or 592 (1989). That requirement is jurisdictional:
“If anything within the notice of appeal is jurisdictional, * * * it must be a description of what action of the trial court is appealed from, because, other than the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Ensley v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Werline v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Grant County Federal Credit Union v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.