Legal Opinion

In re: Nestle Boost Nutritional Drink Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 18, 2025No. 3:21-cv-09812Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE: NESTLE BOOST NUTRITIONAL Case No. 21-cv-09812-JSC DRINK LITIGATION 8 ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION 9 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE NAMED PLAINTIFFS 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 83, 88 11 12 Plaintiffs filed a putative class action on behalf of consumers who purchased two of 13 defendant Nestlé HealthCare Nutrition, Inc.’s products—Boost Glucose Control and Boost 14 Glucose Control High Protein—alleging the “representations that the Products control glucose and 15 are designed for diabetics are deceptive.” (Dkt. No. 59 ¶ 5.)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API