Legal Opinion

Goldner v. Reiss

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 12, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mae/test B. Stechee, J.

The sole issue before me is jurisdictional : were the defendants served with process within the meaning of CPLR 308 (subd. 4) % If so, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, conditionally granted by Judge Lane, will be final.

Each defendant having in fact received a copy of the summons in time to offer a defense and it having been determined that no defense to the claim exists, no injustice would be imposed on the defendants should I uphold the service. But there is a public policy question: Are the courts to look the other way when the law is flouted, because of1‘ no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blatz v. BenschineNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Underwriters Trust Co. v. ScalaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Naccarato v. KotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Eversley v. Ulkan Realty Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  4. Career Placements Inc. v. SibiliaNassau County District Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API