Legal Opinion
Eversley v. Ulkan Realty Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 9, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin B. Stecheb, J.
The petitioners, pursuant to the provisions of article 7-A of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law seek the appointment of an administrator and for other relief. The respondent landlord moves to dismiss the petition.
The motion is granted. To initiate such a proceeding the petition and notice of petition are required to be served personally upon the owner of the premises last registered under section D26-3.1 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and on every mortgagee and lienor of record (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 771, subd. 3). If service ‘ ‘ cannot…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blatz v. BenschineNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Goldner v. ReissCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Underwriters Trust Co. v. ScalaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gomez v. South Williamsburg Better Housing Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Matthews v. Marcus Garvey Brownstone Houses Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
- Matthews v. Marcus Garvey Brownstone Houses, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001