Legal Opinion

Moore v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1942No. Civ. 12806PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J. pro tem.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover for personal injuries received by them, respectively, in a collision between an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff Boyd L. Moore and a truck driven by defendant, and for damages to the automobile from the same collision. After a jury trial judgment went for defendant, from which plaintiffs appeal.

The accident occurred on Whittier Boulevard June 26,1939, at a little before 7 p. m., and as a result of it each plaintiff suffered serious personal injuries and substantial damage was done to the automobile. There is little…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Smarda v. Fruit Growers' Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Ringwald v. BeeneTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Young v. CerratoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Cadwell v. AnschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Pewitt v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Sepulveda v. IshimaruCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Nelson v. Porterville Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API