Legal Opinion
Chidester v. Needles
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided August 22, 1984No. 83-1135PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLE, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this contempt proceeding to determine whether the district court erred in requiring the plaintiff Sherry Chidester to produce certain medical records which the county attorney had subpoenaed for investigative purposes, pursuant to Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(6). The medical clinic, employer of plaintiff Sherry Chidester, moved to quash the subpoena duces tecum and resisted contempt proceedings on both statutory and constitutional grounds, contending (1) that production would violate the physician-patient privilege of Iowa Code section 622.10…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HeemstraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed WitnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State Of Iowa Vs. Ross Ian CashenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Miller v. Continental Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.