Freight Discrimination Cases
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
(State v. Midgett, 85 N.C. 539; Coble v. Shoffner, 75 N.C. 43; State v.Matthews, 48 N.C. 452; cited and approved). The facts are substantially the same as in the preceding cases ofMcGwigan v. The Railroad, except that in these cases, the freight was shipped from a point within the State to a point within the State, and so the question of inter-state commerce did not arise.
There was a judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed. This action is brought to recover a penalty which, it is alleged, the defendant has incurred by a violation of the statute, (The Code, § 1966), which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hadden v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Coble v. ShoffnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Styers v. . Forsyth CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.