Legal Opinion

Freight Discrimination Cases

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(State v. Midgett, 85 N.C. 539; Coble v. Shoffner, 75 N.C. 43; State v.Matthews, 48 N.C. 452; cited and approved). The facts are substantially the same as in the preceding cases ofMcGwigan v. The Railroad, except that in these cases, the freight was shipped from a point within the State to a point within the State, and so the question of inter-state commerce did not arise.

There was a judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed. This action is brought to recover a penalty which, it is alleged, the defendant has incurred by a violation of the statute, (The Code, § 1966), which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Hadden v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Coble v. ShoffnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Styers v. . Forsyth CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API