Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Richard Paul
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 24, 2014No. 2013-0426PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
Following a jury trial in Superior Court (Kissinger, J.), the defendant, Richard Paul, was convicted on three counts of the sale of an ounce or more of marijuana, one count of possession with intent to distribute an ounce or more of marijuana, and one count of the sale of a substance represented to be LSD. See RSA 318-B:2, :26 (2011) (amended 2013). The defendant appeals, asserting that the trial court failed to comply with RSA 519:23-a (Supp. 2013) by declining to give the jury nullification instruction he requested and by giving other jury instructions that effectively contravened his “jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Pierce v. StateSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1843
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Doe, et al. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Caroline Casey, et al. v. NH Secretary of State, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Casey v. NH Secretary of StateDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Doe v. NH Department of Health and Human Services, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Reddy, et al v NH Attorney General et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016