Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 1989No. 88-338PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Timothy Brown, was convicted of one count of first degree murder, RSA 630:1-a, 1(a), following a jury trial. On appeal, the defendant contends that the Trial Court (Dunn, J.) erred in prohibiting the defense from cross-examining Victor Warner, an accomplice, concerning the specific penalty for first degree murder. He further argues that the trial court’s charge to the jury, coupled with its refusal to give the defendant’s requested jury nullification instruction, effectively removed the nullification option from the jury. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The relevant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Francis P. TraceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. United States v. Steven LynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Timothy A. Brown v. Ronald Powell, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. SimondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. BlairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. LeFavor v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API