Legal Opinion
Reddy, et al v NH Attorney General et al
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 1, 2016No. 14-cv-299-JLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Mary Rose Reddy et al. v. Civil No. 14-cv-299-JL Opinion No.
2016 DNH 074P
Joseph Foster et al. CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER This civil rights action implicates a party’s standing to challenge a recently-enacted law prior to its enforcement. The plaintiffs allege that they engage in peaceful expressive activities1 outside of clinics that provide abortion services in New Hampshire. A recently-enacted New Hampshire law permits such clinics to create so-called “buffer zones” around the clinic entrances.
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 132:37-40.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.