Legal Opinion

Brandon v. Garland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 8 Div. 651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The appeal is from a judgment on motion to retax costs.

The defendant pleaded set-off. He was successful in establishing his set-off, or a portion thereof, but less in amount than plaintiff’s demand. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for full costs. Defendant moved to retax the fees of witnesses summoned and examined to prove the different items of set-off and the officers’ fees for issuing and serving subpoenas. The court, on this motion, rendered judgment taxing each party with one-half the costs in the cause.

The' question arises on a construction of section 3662, Code of 1907, as amended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Sullivan Timber Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Holloway v. Henderson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Buxbaum v. McCorleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moulton v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Bynum Bros. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Plateau Community Ass'n v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API