Bynum Bros. v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The legal proceeding had, in the nature of civil action, was in an endeavor to fix the value of appellants’ property for the tax year 1925. The statutes having application are found in'the general revenue bill approved August 22, 1923. Gen. Acts 1923, p. 172, § 32 et seq.
There are assignments of error based on the refusal of requested charges, and when the instruction sought invades the province of the jury it should be refused. McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135; Miller v. Whittington, 202 Ala. 406, 80 So. 499; Gov. Street Lumber Co. v. Ollinger, 18 Ala. App. 518, 94 So. 177. It…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dulaney v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Pickens County v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Monroe Bond & Mortgage Co. v. State Ex Rel. HybartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Davis v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Plateau Community Ass'n v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.