Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1932No. 4 Div. 615PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition was for mandamus and prohibition ; demurrers were sustained thereto, and, the petitioner failing to amend, the petition was dismissed at the cost of the petitioner.

The mandamus sought to have a justice of the peace recuse himself by reason of the fact that he is alleged to have acted as attorney for the plaintiff by preparing the complaint and the necessary affidavit for attachment for rent, and notice to vacate, for the plaintiff in attachment against petitioner, defendant in the justice court, and that respondent was dependent for his compensation upon the lawful fees made and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ex parte State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. In re GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Wagoner v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hulett v. JulianDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Austin v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API