James River Bank v. Hansen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■SHERWOOD, J.
These cases were submitted on the same evidence in the lower court, and were argued and submitted together in this court, and, while separate appeals were taken, they involve practically identical questions of law and will be determined in one opinion.
The facts necessary to a determination of these cases are as follows:
On the 2nd of September, 1921, Peter Van Houten, being indebted to respondent bank, executed and delivered to it promissory note for $3,400 and a mortgage on a large amount of personal property securing the same. The mortgage was filed about September 2, 1921. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Smith v. Crawford County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Fairweather v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Fuller v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Flood v. ButzbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farmers' State Bank v. Van HoutenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- First Security Bank v. Zaring Farm & Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Barkley v. BoardmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- National Ass'n of Credit Men, Montana-Wyoming Unit v. MossWyoming Supreme Court · 1960