Legal Opinion
Freight Forwarders Inst. v. United States, ICC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 27, 1976No. 74 C 2311PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have brought this suit to set aside the report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (here inafter Commission) in a proceeding identified as Ex Parte No. 266 (Sub-No. 1), Investigation Into the Scope of Freight Forwarder Terminal Areas, 343 I.C.C. 565. The end result of that proceeding was that the Commission refused to expand the terminal areas of the freight forwarders (hereinafter forwarders). It is the reasoning of the Commission’s decision that the forwarders take umbrage with and which they use as a base for their attempt to have the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Northern Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lakehead Pipeline Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Transway Corp. v. Hawaiian Express Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kehrer v. Correctional Medical ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Crete Carrier Corporation, Contract Carrier Conference, Cargo Contract Carrier Corporation, Leaseway Transportation Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation, Chromalloy American Corporation, Intervenors. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chromalloy American Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.