Dell Products Lp v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Dell Products LP’s (“Dell” or “Plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant United States’ (“Defendant” or “Government”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Dell contends that the subject batteries should be classified as “automatic data processing machines” under heading 8471 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) 1 , duty-free, the same classification as the notebook computers with which the batteries were packaged. 2 The Government maintains that United States Customs & Border…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dis Vintage LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Estee Lauder, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012