Estee Lauder, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff Estée Lauder, Inc. challenges U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) classification of its “Blockbuster” cosmetic sets. Proper administrative protest procedure having been undertaken and all liquidated duties, taxes and fees having been paid, see 19 U.S.C. §§ 1514, 1515, jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).
I. Facts
Plaintiff Estée Lauder is “well known for being a makeup, skin care and fragrance company”. 1 Estée Lauder chose the makeup colors in the set at issue herein so as to have an appealing assortment of makeup shades…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.