Legal Opinion
Smyth v. Field
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 1, 1996No. 94-P-1135PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The plaintiffs, Geoffrey M. Smyth, Burton J. Power, and Christopher C. Yule, brought a four-count complaint against Marshall Field, Fifth, CC&F Investors, Inc. (CC&F Investors), CC&F Commercial, Inc. (CC&F Commercial)(hereinafter collectively the CC&F defendants), MGH Health Services Corporation (MGH), and Brim of Massachusetts, Inc. (Brim). Count I alleged breach of fiduciary duties; Count II alleged breach of contract; Count III alleged violation of a constructive trust and sought an accounting; and Count IV alleged violation of G. L. c. 93A. According to the plaintiffs’ complaint, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- United States v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Fertilizer Co. v. Fall River Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fronk v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- First Taunton Financial Corp. v. Arlington Land Acquisition-99, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Hayeck v. Fruit Sever Realty Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011
- Idnani v. Venus Capital Management, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011
- Mastromatteo v. MastromatteoMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006