Legal Opinion

Ewer v. Dietrich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Calendar 46,000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case relates to discovery. Defendant Simeon R. Dietrich has appealed in the nature of mandamus (upon leave granted) from an order of the circuit court requiring him to answer certain specific inquiries.

The question comes up in this way:

On July 17,1952, plaintiffs Ray Ewer, individually and as assignee of John Garman, and Newark Fire Insurance Company, as subrogee of Ray Ewer, filed a declaration in 3 counts alleging (1) a breach of implied warranty; (2) negligence resulting in injury to plaintiff and (3) negligence resulting in injury to plaintiff’s assignee, John Garman, all arising out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. TomlinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hallett v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Vincent v. Van BlooysMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Banaszkiewicz v. BaunMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Blough v. SteffensMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Klabunde v. StanleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Thomai v. MIBA Hydramechanica Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API