Legal Opinion

Blough v. Steffens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1957No. Docket 25, Calendar 46,936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This case concerns title to a corn crop ripening in a farmer’s field. In law school terms the legal problem would be stated thus:

“A,” the owner of Whiteacre, contracted with “X” to plant 22 acres in corn to be divided 1/3 to “A” and 2/3 to “X”. While the corn was ripening in the fields, “A” sold Whiteacre to “B” by written conveyance, orally reserving the corn. On “B’s” refusal to let “X” harvest the corn, “X” sues “A” and “B” for the value of his 2/3 share of the corn crop. “A” likewise claims his 1/3. Can each recover ?

This statement of our principal question omits reference to a fact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simonelli v. CassidyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hartka v. HartkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Donaldson v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Clifton v. Jackson Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Vanderkarr v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Jacques v. JacquesMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Groth v. StillsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Blackwell v. KeysMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Langschwager v. PinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API