Hemphill v. Hemphill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kunzeman, J.
On this appeal, the noncustodial parent maintains that his right to meaningful visitation with the parties’ children would, in effect, be eliminated by his former wife’s relocation of the children to London, England, where her new husband resides. Conversely, the plaintiff argues that the trial court properly found that her remarriage constituted an "exceptional circumstance” and that the relocation of the children to London was in their best interests. It is well settled that if exceptional or compelling circumstances prompt the move, the ultimate governing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Weiss v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Holder v. PolanskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Martinez v. KonczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Radford v. PropperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Taylor v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Rybicki v. RybickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Poretsky v. PoretskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ladizhensky v. LadizhenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.