Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*320OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

In this child custody dispute, we are asked to reverse an order by the trial court prohibiting the custodial parent in this case, Deborah Taylor Mitten, from moving out of state with her three-year-old daughter, Brittney, over the objection of the noncustodial parent, David Steve Taylor. The resolution of this dispute requires a reassessment of the procedural rules established in a trilogy of recent cases, beginning with our opinion in Seessel v. Seessel, 748 S.W.2d 422 (Tenn.1988). Because we find that Deborah Mitten should have been allowed to move with the child…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Garska v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Kenner v. KennerTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Blair v. BadenhopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API