Legal Opinion
Kreisler Manufacturing Corp. v. Homstad Goldsmith, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 1982No. 81-1279PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Plaintiff Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (Kreisler), a Florida corporation, brought an action in Florida against defendant Homstad Goldsmith, Inc. (Hom-stad), a Minnesota corporation, and, after acquiring jurisdiction by means of personal service under a provision of Florida’s long arm statute, Fla.Stat. § 48.193(l)(g) (1977), obtained a default judgment in the amount of $1,574.10 plus interest. Subsequently, Kreisler brought an action on the judgment in Minnesota. The Rice County District Court entered a judgment giving effect to the Florida default judgment. Defendant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Baldwin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Stangel v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.