Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1985No. 14498PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
On February 17, 1981, a default judgment was entered in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, in favor of Heinold Commodities, Inc. (Heinold), a Delaware corporation, against Howard Baldwin (Baldwin), a South Dakota resident, for $13,861.00, plus interest of $1,936.74 and attorney fees of $405.00, for a total of $16,202.74 and Heinold’s costs of the Illinois action. Heinold filed the foreign judgment with the Meade County Clerk of Courts in Sturgis, South Dakota, in November of 1981. On December 1, 1981, the Meade County Sheriff was ordered to execute the judgment. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Costa Lecopulos, A/K/A Constantinos LecopulosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Leonard J. Furbee v. Vantage Press, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wooster v. WoosterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Red Fox v. HettichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Marworth, Inc. v. McGuireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- O'Neill Farms, Inc. v. ReinertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. TravisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.