Legal Opinion

In re the Care & Treatment of Ontiberos

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 17, 2012No. 100,362PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

This appeal arises under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act (KSVPA), K.S.A. 59-29a01 et seq. A civil jury declared Robert Ontiberos a sexually violent predator and determined he should be committed for treatment until he is safe for release. The Court of Appeals vacated the commitment and remanded for a new trial because it held that Ontiberos received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the State’s attorney committed misconduct during the trial. In re Care b Treatment of Ontiberos, 45 Kan. App. 2d 235, 255-56, 247 P.3d 686…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. In re Care & Treatment of ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API