Legal Opinion

In re Care & Treatment of Thomas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 1, 2015No. 108563PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

This appeal arises after a civil jury declared Kodi A. Thomas to be a sexually violent predator under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act (KSVPA), K.S.A. 59-29a01 et seq. Thomas claims the district court erred by: (1) permitting the State’s experts to testify about hearsay statements contained within his treatment records; and (2) improperly instructing on the State’s burden of proof. We affirm because the hearsay challenge was not preserved for appellate review and the jury instruction deviation from our pattern instructions does not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. HerbelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. CruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Biglow v. EidenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. Burnette v. EubanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Huffman v. Meier's Ready MixCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. Beltz – Stegall – AffirmedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  5. State v. BerneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API