Legal Opinion

Haney v. Fenley, Bate, Deaton and Porter

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1981No. B-9660PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a venue action. Suit for recovery of attorney’s fees was brought by Fenley et al., a law partnership, against John Haney and Craig 0. Canon, as a partnership and as individuals. Haney filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Walker County. Fenley et al., in their controverting plea, alleged that suit was maintainable in Angelina County against the partnership under Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann. art. 1995, § 23. The trial court overruled Haney’s plea of privilege, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 612 S.W.2d 208.

Article 1995, Subdivision 23 provides, in pertinent part:

“Suits against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bubble Up Bottling Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Hudgens v. Bain Equipment & Tube Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Heid Bros. v. Mueller-Huber Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Haney v. Fenley, Bate, Deaton, & PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Lakedreams, a Texas Partnership v. Steve Taylor, D/B/A California T'sCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P. and John WeaklyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Burnap v. Linnartz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  5. Kao Holdings, L.P. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API