Burnap v. Linnartz
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant lawyers in a legal malpractice action. The appellant, Willard Burnap, contends numerous unresolved fact issues preclude summary judgment. We agree that material issues of fact remain regarding the existence of an attorney-client relationship, and that these issues must be submitted to a jury. We find, however, that Burnap’s claims against appel-lees William Rork and McCamish & Martin, P.C. are barred by the statute of limitations. We therefore affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
STANDARD…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Tinsman & Houser, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- In the Interest of M.M.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Savage v. Psychiatric Institute of Bedford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Querner v. Rindfuss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.