Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1904No. Nos. 13,722 (189)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $500.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

The hardware firm of Brandt & Edwards, of East Grand Forks, was dissolved by agreement, under the terms of which the retiring partner was, upon the ascertainment of the assets and liabilities, to pay the remaining partner the balance found to be due. There was an attempted adjustment and disagreement as to the amount of such liabilities, an action was brought therefor by plaintiff, the remaining partner, who recovered a verdict. There was a motion for a new trial, which was denied. This appeal is from that order.

Under the articles of copartnership the firm was to continue in business for five…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reeves & Co. v. CressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Matthews v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Nims v. NimsSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  4. Fish v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
  5. J. G. Shaw Blank Book Co. v. MaybellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API